IMMIGRATION
POLICIES
Immigration policies and practices are always changing. Ms. Chotalia can help you with current information and design current solutions to help you to immigrate to Canada.
Landmark Immigration CasesFelipe v M.E.I. [1994] Imm 5296-93 (F.C.T.D.)Judicial review challenging medical inadmissibility provisions being then s. 19(1)(a)(ii) Immigration Act on basis of violation of s. 15 Charter – applicant contracting breast cancer in Canada and being subject to removal
See also Turingan v M.E.I. (1993) 72 F.T.R. 316 (F.C.T.D.)(A.C.J. Jerome) Judicial review – judgment establishing the unique nature of foreign domestic worker program; duty of fairness S.M.A. v. Canadian Security Intelligence Service (2000) (SIRC) Successfully challenged CSIS’ allegations that client was a “terrorist"; SIRC (Review Committee) See also S.M.A. v. Minister of Citizenship & Immigration (Sept. 2000) Application for mandamus compelling Minister to land client; violation of section 7 Charter Rights Bernardez v M.C.I (1995) 101 F.T.R. 203 (F.C.T.D.) (A.C.J. Jerome) Judicial review granted re: exclusion order based upon unauthorized employment - duty of fairness - nanny in a powerless position vis a vis employer; compliance with employer’s directions to be viewed contextually; see also (1994) 27 Imm. L.R. (2d) 149 (F.C.T.D.) (A.C.J. Jerome) (interlocutory relief granted - stays - employer control over domestic worker) and stays in Encila v. M.C.I. [1996] F.C.J. No. 995 (F.C.T.D.) (Gibson J.) application for interim stay and work permit; Caletena v. Canada (1994) 74 F.T.R. 78 - interim stay and work authorization granted - unique nature of foreign domestic worker program confirmed |
Immigration /Judicial Reviews
Citizenship
Kurani v. MCI (Oct 16, 2007) T-2249-06 (FCTD) Successful appeal – breach of procedural fairness re: denial of legal counsel; new hearing and successfully obtained citizenship. Preservation of Appeal Rights Bautista v. M.C.I. (January 16, 2006) IMM-2866–05 (F. C. T.D.) (FCA) Judicial review of inadmissibility of permanent resident on basis of criminality; issue of whether s.196 IRPA transitions provisions nullify appeal to Board thus prohibiting consideration of humanitarian and compassionate factors Extensive Litigation Securing Rights for Foreign -Disenfranchised Women Camara v. MCI 2009 IMM-5694-08 successful judicial review of negative decision re: refusal to grant TRP to a caregiver whose daughter is medically inadmissible S. Kim (2006- 2007) Korean woman / physical & sexual abuse / child abduction / inland immigration h&c application McCoy v. MCI (2007) Imm 4228-07 judicial review of overseas visa officer decision: refusal of overseas h&c application in 117(9)(d) case; Crown consenting as reasons not adequate; received costs award against Crown of $1000.00; Thai woman seeking re-unification with long lost daughter; obtained h&c application thereafter Demchenko v. Alberta Pension Administration (2003) Successfully obtained pension settlement for Ukrainian widow of deceased Canadian citizen Galeta v. M.C.I. [2002] Imm 2775-02 (F.C.T.D.) Judicial review of officer’s discretion refusing landing to Ukrainian widow/ 9 yr common law relationship with deceased Canadian / Canadian child. Procedural Fairness - Administrative Law Al Jarrah v. MCI (2008) Imm 911-08 had visa officer decision set aside by consent re: lack of procedural fairness George v. MCI (2007) Imm 2429-07 Obtained stay pending judicial review; successful judicial review of refusal to grant inland h&c application to Sierra Leone senior citizen couple who were entitled to parental sponsorship by Cdn daughter; lengthy processing times and reasoning of officer at issue Al Jarrah v. MCI (2008) Imm 911-08 Had visa officer decision set aside by consent re: lack of procedural fairness George v. MCI (2007) Imm 2429-07 Obtained stay pending judicial review; successful judicial review of refusal to grant inland h&c application to Sierra Leone senior citizen couple who were entitled to parental sponsorship by Canadian daughter; lengthy processing times and reasoning of officer at issue Abuamra v. MCI (2006 - ) IMM-5140-06 (FC) Marriage of convenience and administrative fairness Lello v. The Minister of Citizenship & Immigration 2005 FC 109 (F.C.T.D.) (VA3-01394) Judicial review successful where board failed to consider relevant factor (sponsorship) in exercise of humanitarian & compassionate discretion; successful in further submissions to IAD Theophilus v. M.C.I. [2004]Imm-1362-04 ( F.C. T.D.) Judicial review -procedural fairness of hearing at issue; decision set aside & new hearing granted on consent; successful on new hearing - Theophilus v. M.C.I.(December 6, 2004) VA2-03576-E Vendiola v. M.C.I. [2003] Imm 413-02 (F.C.T.D.) Judicial review-Successful review of visa officer’s refusal of live-in caregiver –consideration of irrelevant factors by visa officer Khaira v. M.C.I. (1994) 75 F.T.R. 169 (F.C.T.D.)(A.C.J. Jerome) Judicial review of visa officer's rejection of application for family business job application Immigration Appeals Extensive successful appeals – Spousal sponsorship; adoptions; residency, criminal inadmissibility, successful; Wowo (May 25/2005)(IRB) MA4-04417 Convention Refugee hearing - Congo; hearing conducted in French language |